How many Next.js websites did you analyze?

94 sites using Next.js. Each one ran the full diagnostic — PageSpeed, SEO checks, SSL verification, and full tech-stack detection.

Next.js sites in our sample average 60/100 on Google PageSpeed with an LCP of 9.1s. Performance depends more on how the site is configured than on the platform itself — we see fast and slow Next.js sites in every industry we track.

What industries use Next.js the most?

Next.js is most common in asian restaurants (6 sites in our sample). Full breakdown is in the Adoption by industry section above.

How do I know if Next.js is right for my website?

Run the free audit on this page. You'll get your own site's performance scored against the Next.js benchmark, so you can see whether your current stack is costing you speed or SEO rankings.

JavaScript frameworks

Next.js website performance

Average page takes 9.1s to render its main content — 6.6s over Google's passing threshold.

Data as of April 202694 sites analyzed

At a glance

Average scores across 94 Next.js sites

Performance

SEO

Accessibility

Core Web Vitals

How Next.js sites perform in the real world

Avg. LCP

9.1s

Google's Good: < 2.5s

Avg. FCP

2.8s

Good: < 1.8s

Avg. CLS

0.036

Good: < 0.1

Avg. TTFB

0.2s

Good: < 0.8s

Performance spread

How Next.js sites cluster on page speed

PageSpeed scores grouped into Google's tier labels. The shape of the distribution tells you whether the industry average hides a few great outliers — or a long tail of broken sites.

Critical0–49
27.7%
Needs work50–69
29.8%
Decent70–89
42.6%
Good90–100
0.0%

Mixed: sites are spread roughly evenly across the tiers. There's no single bar to clear — whatever you fix, it'll put you ahead of a good chunk of the sample.

Adoption by industry

Where Next.js shows up most

Top industries running this stack, based on the diagnostic sample.

Quick wins

The fixes that would move most Next.js sites forward

Ranked by how often we saw each issue across 94 sites. If yours has these, every competitor with them fixed is beating you on something Google measures.

01
Main content takes too long to appear
Found on 14.9% of sitesSpeedhigh impact
02
1 broken links
Found on 13.8% of sitesSecuritymedium impact
03
1 pages share the same title
Found on 11.7% of sitesSEOmedium impact
04
No sitemap found
Found on 5.3% of sitesSEOhigh impact
05
No robots.txt found
Found on 2.1% of sitesSEOhigh impact

FAQ

Common questions

How we fix it

Web Boost — we fix the gaps we just showed you, every month

The diagnostic above tells you what's broken on Next.js websites. Web Boost is the monthly retainer that actually ships the fixes: senior developers, AI-assisted, concrete before/after reports, cancel anytime.

Plans from

$497/mo

See how Web Boost works →

Speed + Core Web Vitals
Image compression, caching, lazy loading, render-blocking cleanup — the fixes the benchmark above flagged.
On-page SEO + structured data
Meta tags, canonicals, schema markup, internal linking — every signal Google's crawler expects, audited and fixed.
Conversion rate + mobile UX
CTAs, forms, microcopy, mobile layout. Turn the traffic you're already getting into leads and customers.

The diagnostic engine is the same one we ship for product and agency clients

Is Next.js working for your site?

Email us and we'll run a diagnostic comparing your performance to the Next.js sample above. No intake form, results back within a business day.

Email us for a diagnosis

Or write to hello@borahlabs.us directly. No intake form, no pitch deck.