JavaScript graphics

Average page takes 14.6s to render its main content — 12.1s over Google's passing threshold.

Data as of May 202622 sites analyzed

At a glance

Performance
SEO
Accessibility

Core Web Vitals

Avg. LCP

14.6s

Google's Good: < 2.5s

Avg. FCP

5.0s

Good: < 1.8s

Avg. CLS

0.074

Good: < 0.1

Avg. TTFB

0.1s

Good: < 0.8s

Performance spread

PageSpeed scores grouped into Google's tier labels. The shape of the distribution tells you whether the industry average hides a few great outliers — or a long tail of broken sites.

  • Critical049
    36.4%
  • Needs work5069
    63.6%
  • Decent7089
    0.0%
  • Good90100
    0.0%

Heavy on the slow side: 100% of sites score below 70. Speed is the differentiator most of this market hasn't invested in yet.

Adoption by industry

Top industries running this stack, based on the diagnostic sample.

Quick wins

Ranked by how often we saw each issue across 22 sites. If yours has these, every competitor with them fixed is beating you on something Google measures.

  1. 01

    Main content takes too long to appear

    Found on 100% of sitesSpeedhigh impact
  2. 02

    9 broken links

    Found on 72.7% of sitesSecuritymedium impact
  3. 03

    1 pages share the same title

    Found on 68.2% of sitesSEOmedium impact
  4. 04

    Certificate expires in 20 days

    Found on 22.7% of sitesSecuritymedium impact
  5. 05

    No sitemap found

    Found on 18.2% of sitesSEOhigh impact

FAQ

22 sites using particles.js. Each one ran the full diagnostic — PageSpeed, SEO checks, SSL verification, and full tech-stack detection.

particles.js sites in our sample average 50/100 on Google PageSpeed with an LCP of 14.6s. Performance depends more on how the site is configured than on the platform itself — we see fast and slow particles.js sites in every industry we track.

particles.js is most common in law firms (3 sites in our sample). Full breakdown is in the Adoption by industry section above.

Run the free audit on this page. You'll get your own site's performance scored against the particles.js benchmark, so you can see whether your current stack is costing you speed or SEO rankings.

How we fix it

Web Boost — we fix the gaps we just showed you, every month

The diagnostic above tells you what's broken on particles.js websites. Web Boost is the monthly retainer that actually ships the fixes: senior developers, AI-assisted, concrete before/after reports, cancel anytime.

  • Speed + Core Web Vitals

    Image compression, caching, lazy loading, render-blocking cleanup — the fixes the benchmark above flagged.

  • On-page SEO + structured data

    Meta tags, canonicals, schema markup, internal linking — every signal Google's crawler expects, audited and fixed.

  • Conversion rate + mobile UX

    CTAs, forms, microcopy, mobile layout. Turn the traffic you're already getting into leads and customers.

The diagnostic engine is the same one we ship for product and agency clients

  • Beamline
  • Mabbly
  • EY
  • Allianz
  • Workwize
  • Toptal
  • Tent Foundation
  • Koppa
  • RLC Solutions

Is particles.js working for your site?

Email us and we'll run a diagnostic comparing your performance to the particles.js sample above. No intake form, results back within a business day.

Or write to hello@borahlabs.us directly. No intake form, no pitch deck.