Boise · Software companies

Average page takes 8.7s to render its main content — 6.2s over Google's passing threshold.

Data as of May 202614 sites analyzed

At a glance

Averages across the full sample. Google's thresholds shown as the white marker on each bar.

Performance
SEO
Accessibility

Core Web Vitals

The four metrics Google uses to rank pages. Lower is better for all of them.

Largest Contentful Paint8.75svs 2.50s
First Contentful Paint3.64svs 1.80s
Cumulative Layout Shift0.05vs 0.10
Time to First Byte0.08svs 0.80s

Local vs national

A head-to-head on every metric Google measures. Green is better than the national average, purple is worse.

MetricLocalUS averageGap
Performance score5856+2.5
SEO score9191+0.7
Largest Contentful Paint8.7s9.8s-1.04s
Cumulative Layout Shift0.050.09-0.04
Time to First Byte0.1s0.1s+0.01

Security

No SSL in 2026 is a trust killer — and a Chrome warning. These numbers should be 100%.

Sites with SSL

Average
92.9%

13 secure, 1 without

Sites without SSL

Exposed
1

Each of these loses visitors at the browser warning

Technology landscape

Top platforms, CMSs, and analytics tools detected across the sample.

Social presence

Share of sites that link out to each platform from their homepage footer or header.

With any social

64.3%

At least one platform linked

facebook

50%

7 sites linking out

linkedin

42.9%

6 sites linking out

Performance spread

PageSpeed scores grouped into Google's tier labels. The shape of the distribution tells you whether the industry average hides a few great outliers — or a long tail of broken sites.

LocalUS average
  • Critical049
    42.9%vs 36.7% us average
  • Needs work5069
    28.6%vs 40.0% us average
  • Decent7089
    14.3%vs 16.7% us average
  • Good90100
    14.3%vs 6.7% us average

Long tail: 43% of sites land in the Critical tier. This is where the easiest wins live — any site that climbs above 50 outperforms nearly half the market.

Tech stack divergence

Where the local tech stack over- or under-indexes against the national benchmark. Big gaps often signal a local builder's preference — or an opportunity if you're choosing a platform.

TechnologyBoise software companiesUS averageGap
HTTP/30.0%40.0%-40 pts
Amazon Web ServicesPaaS35.7%0.0%+35.7 pts
Facebook Pixel0.0%30.0%-30 pts
Google AnalyticsAnalytics57.1%73.3%-16.2 pts
HSTSSecurity64.3%50.0%+14.3 pts
Google Tag ManagerTag managers64.3%53.3%+11 pts
PHPProgramming languages50.0%40.0%+10 pts
WordPressCMS42.9%36.7%+6.2 pts

SEO health

Adoption of the table-stakes SEO signals across the sample. Gaps here are the cheapest wins — any one of these fixes tends to outperform months of content work.

Viewport meta

Strong
85.7%

Sites declaring a mobile viewport — without this, Chrome renders pages at desktop zoom on phones.

Meta description

Strong
85.7%

Sites with a populated meta description — the text Google shows in search results.

Canonical tag

Mixed
64.3%

Sites declaring which URL is the main one — prevents duplicate-content penalties across www, http, and tracking-parameter variants.

Open Graph tags

Mixed
78.6%

Sites with og:title / og:image tags — controls how links preview on LinkedIn, Facebook, iMessage.

Structured data

Mixed
50%

Sites publishing JSON-LD schema — unlocks rich results (stars, hours, FAQ snippets).

Quick wins

Ranked by how often we saw each issue across 14 sites. If yours has these, every competitor with them fixed is beating you on something Google measures.

  1. 01

    12 pages share the same title

    Found on 100% of sitesSEOmedium impact
  2. 02

    Main content takes too long to appear

    Found on 78.6% of sitesSpeedhigh impact
  3. 03

    5 broken links

    Found on 42.9% of sitesSecuritymedium impact
  4. 04

    No sitemap found

    Found on 21.4% of sitesSEOhigh impact
  5. 05

    No robots.txt found

    Found on 21.4% of sitesSEOhigh impact

FAQ

Related industries

Readers who compare software companies usually care about these next. Same methodology, different vertical.

How we fix it

Web Boost — we fix the gaps we just showed you, every month

The diagnostic above tells you what's broken on Boise software companies. Web Boost is the monthly retainer that actually ships the fixes: senior developers, AI-assisted, concrete before/after reports, cancel anytime.

  • Speed + Core Web Vitals

    Image compression, caching, lazy loading, render-blocking cleanup — the fixes the benchmark above flagged.

  • On-page SEO + structured data

    Meta tags, canonicals, schema markup, internal linking — every signal Google's crawler expects, audited and fixed.

  • Conversion rate + mobile UX

    CTAs, forms, microcopy, mobile layout. Turn the traffic you're already getting into leads and customers.

The diagnostic engine is the same one we ship for product and agency clients

  • Beamline
  • Mabbly
  • EY
  • Allianz
  • Workwize
  • Toptal
  • Tent Foundation
  • Koppa
  • RLC Solutions

Want a diagnostic on your Boise site?

Email us and we'll benchmark it against the other 14 software companies in Boise we've already analyzed. Results back within a business day.

Or write to hello@borahlabs.us directly. No intake form, no pitch deck.